Ronald Whitfield, et al v. Texas Children Memorial Herman, et al
| DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BEHAVIORAL HOSPITALS OF BELLAIRE AND (UNKNOWN), CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, CRIMINAL JUSTICE PAROLE DIVISION, HARRIS COUNTY TEXAS, HARRIS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES, TEXAS STATE COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT, COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS, JULI CROW, Texas Attorney and CITY OF HOUSTON, MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS |
| RONALD DWAYNE WHITFIELD, Presumed Father, also known as Ronald Dwayne Whitfield, Prophet |
| 19-20369 |
| May 24, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to comply with the Court's notices of 06/05/2019 [19-20369] (CAG) [Entered: 07/08/2019 11:39 AM] |
| UPDATED CASE PROCESSING NOTICE sent. Letter issued to Ms. Brandy Brenay Charles-Whitfield requesting her to sign the NOA. [19-20369] (NFD) [Entered: 06/05/2019 09:38 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9068411-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Miscellaneous due on 07/05/2019 for Appellant Ronald Dwayne Whitfield. (monitoring for payment of sanctions in cases: 03-20424- $250.00 and 97-00454 - $100.00) [19-20369] (NFD) [Entered: 06/05/2019 09:29 AM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Ms. Brandy Brenay Charles-Whitfield, K.L.W. and Mr. Ronald Dwayne Whitfield [19-20369] (AS) [Entered: 05/24/2019 03:01 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
