In Re: Darrell Harper
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| DARRELL J. HARPER |
| 19-20617 |
| September 3, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Motion received from Appellant Mr. Darrell J. Harper because Until sanction is paid, not processing, also case closed. [19-20617] (DMS) [Entered: 10/31/2019 12:30 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER dismissing appeals pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to comply with the Court's notice of 09/19/2019 [19-20617] (DMS) [Entered: 10/22/2019 07:39 AM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Motion received from Appellant Mr. Darrell J. Harper because Explained to Mr. Harper on a previous letter we will not address anything further from him until his sanction is paid. [19-20617] (DMS) [Entered: 10/16/2019 11:16 AM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Default has been remedied document and objection received from Appellant Mr. Darrell J. Harper because Sanction not paid [19-20617] (DMS) [Entered: 10/09/2019 03:55 PM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Motions received from Appellant Mr. Darrell J. Harper because The appellant must pay his sanction. [19-20617] (DMS) [Entered: 10/07/2019 12:06 PM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Objecting to his sanction received from Appellant Mr. Darrell J. Harper because His sanctions are still outstanding therefore we are taking no action on this document [19-20617] (DMS) [Entered: 10/03/2019 08:06 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process after monitoring for after monitoring for sanctions to be paid. [9150660-2] [19-20617] (Additional Appeal) (JMW) [Entered: 09/23/2019 01:37 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process after monitoring for sanctions to be paid. [9148266-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Miscellaneous due on 10/21/2019 for Appellant Darrell J. Harper [19-20617] (ABT) [Entered: 09/19/2019 09:54 AM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Involvement terminated for Appellee USA in 19-20617. Reason: U.S. is not a party to this case. [19-20617] (CAG) [Entered: 09/17/2019 10:45 AM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9146158-2] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Darrell J. Harper. [9146158-1] [19-20617] (CAG) [Entered: 09/17/2019 10:51 AM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Darrell J. Harper [19-20617] (CCR) [Entered: 09/03/2019 03:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In Re: Darrell Harper | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Carmen Castillo Mitchell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: DARRELL J. HARPER | |
| Represented By: | Darrell J. Harper |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
