Charles Lincoln, III v. Miklos Mendler, et al
| MIKLOS MENDLER, also known as Miki Mendler, also known as Mendler Miklos, also known as Nikkos Mendler, LATOYA CANTRELL, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Mayor of the City of New Orleans, OFFSIDE L.L.C., doing business as Avenue Cafe, MITCHELL J. LANDRIEU, UNIDENTIFIED PARTIES, Does 1-10 and NEW ORLEANS CITY, A Political Corporation |
| CHARLES EDWARD LINCOLN, III |
| 19-30399 |
| May 21, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| SUGGESTION OF BANKRUPTCY filed by Appellant Mr. Charles Edward Lincoln, III Case placed in abeyance. [19-30399] (AGL) [Entered: 06/17/2019 10:47 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Rodney J. Lacoste Jr. for Appellee Offside L.L.C. in 19-30399, Attorney Rodney J. Lacoste Jr. for Appellee Miklos Mendler in 19-30399 [19-30399] (AGL) [Entered: 06/07/2019 09:44 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-30399] (Rodney J. Lacoste Jr.) [Entered: 06/06/2019 04:39 PM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 05/29/2019 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Charles Edward Lincoln, III. Fee due on 06/28/2019 for Appellant Charles Edward Lincoln III [19-30399] (AGL) [Entered: 05/29/2019 02:27 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9061110-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [19-30399] (DMS) [Entered: 05/24/2019 02:39 PM] |
| CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Charles Edward Lincoln, III [19-30399] (LEF) [Entered: 05/21/2019 09:15 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
