William Adams v. Alcolac, Inc., et al
| KATHLEEN J. AIKENS, WILLIAM J. ADAMS, LINDA PEARL AKRIDGE, RAY AIKENS, SR. and RONALD W. AKRIDGE |
| RHODIA INC. and ALCOLAC, INC. |
| 19-40899 |
| October 28, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Adams v. Alcolac, Inc.
|
|
William Adams v. Alcolac, Inc., et al
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| TRANSCRIPT FILED IN DISTRICT COURT Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Dion Rupa, Dt. Filed in Dist. Ct: 12/12/2019 Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment deadline canceled [19-40899] (JMW) [Entered: 12/23/2019 08:19 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 3:18-CV-185. Electronic ROA due on 01/07/2020. [19-40899] (JMW) [Entered: 12/23/2019 08:19 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellees Alcolac, Inc. and Rhodia Inc.. DETAILS: Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Dion Rupa, Proceeding Type and Date: Motion Hearing 08/14/2019. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment due on 12/16/2019 for Dion Rupa. Electronic Filing Processed: [ # 9204650-2 ] [19-40899] (CAG) [Entered: 12/06/2019 01:52 PM] |
| ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellees Alcolac, Inc. and Rhodia Inc.for the Court to process. Date of service: 12/06/2019 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Cherry, Datla, Ellsworth, Oakley, Welsh; Attorney for Appellants: Doyle, Maloney, Martin, Pitts. [19-40899] (Bruce Davidson Oakley ) [Entered: 12/06/2019 11:26 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 3:18-CV-185. Electronic ROA due on 12/18/2019. [19-40899] (CAG) [Entered: 12/03/2019 12:03 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [19-40899] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellants Mr. William J. Adams, Mr. Kathleen J. Aikens, Mr. Ray Aikens, Sr., Mr. Linda Pearl Akridge and Mr. Ronald W. Akridge advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 12/02/2019 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Datla, Ellsworth, Oakley; Attorney for Appellants: Doyle, Maloney, Martin, Pitts [19-40899] (Michael Patrick Doyle ) [Entered: 12/02/2019 03:39 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Michael Patrick Doyle for Appellant Ronald W. Akridge in 19-40899, Attorney Michael Patrick Doyle for Appellant Linda Pearl Akridge in 19-40899, Attorney Michael Patrick Doyle for Appellant Kathleen J. Aikens in 19-40899, Attorney Michael Patrick Doyle for Appellant Ray Aikens Sr. in 19-40899, Attorney Michael Patrick Doyle for Appellant William J. Adams in 19-40899 [19-40899] (CAG) [Entered: 11/25/2019 11:17 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellants Mr. William J. Adams, Mr. Kathleen J. Aikens, Mr. Ray Aikens, Sr., Mr. Linda Pearl Akridge and Mr. Ronald W. Akridge and returned because DKT-13 form is required. Transcript Order deadline updated to 12/10/2019 for Appellants William J. Adams, Kathleen J. Aikens, Ray Aikens Sr., Linda Pearl Akridge and Ronald W. Akridge [19-40899] (CAG) [Entered: 11/25/2019 11:19 AM] |
| ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellants Mr. William J. Adams, Mr. Kathleen J. Aikens, Mr. Ray Aikens, Sr., Mr. Linda Pearl Akridge and Mr. Ronald W. Akridgefor the Court to process. Date of service: 11/22/2019 via US mail - Attorney for Appellees: Cherry, Welsh; Attorney for Appellant: Martin; email - Attorney for Appellees: Datla, Ellsworth, Oakley; Attorney for Appellants: Doyle, Maloney, Pitts. [19-40899] (Michael Patrick Doyle ) [Entered: 11/22/2019 02:58 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Michael Patrick Doyle for Mr. William J. Adams, Mr. Kathleen J. Aikens, Mr. Ray Aikens, Sr., Mr. Linda Pearl Akridge and Mr. Ronald W. Akridge for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-40899] (Michael Patrick Doyle ) [Entered: 11/22/2019 02:56 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Bruce Davidson Oakley for Appellee Rhodia Inc. in 19-40899, Attorney Bruce Davidson Oakley for Appellee Alcolac, Inc. in 19-40899 [19-40899] (CAG) [Entered: 11/04/2019 10:11 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Jessica Lynn Ellsworth for party(s) Appellee Alcolac, Inc. Appellee Rhodia Inc., in case 19-40899 [19-40899] (CAG) [Entered: 11/04/2019 10:12 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Kirti Datla for party(s) Appellee Alcolac, Inc. Appellee Rhodia Inc., in case 19-40899 [19-40899] (CAG) [Entered: 11/04/2019 10:14 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-40899] (Jessica Lynn Ellsworth ) [Entered: 11/01/2019 12:37 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Bruce Davidson Oakley for Alcolac, Inc. and Rhodia Inc. for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-40899] (Bruce Davidson Oakley ) [Entered: 11/01/2019 02:47 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-40899] (Kirti Datla ) [Entered: 11/01/2019 06:08 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9180391-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 11/15/2019 for Appellants William J. Adams, Kathleen J. Aikens, Ray Aikens Sr., Linda Pearl Akridge and Ronald W. Akridge [19-40899] (DMS) [Entered: 10/31/2019 01:59 PM] |
| PARTY LIMIT CASE. (FOR A FULL LIST OF PARTIES FOR THIS APPEAL, PLEASE REFER TO THE DISTRICT COURT'S DOCKET SHEET.) [19-40899] (AS) [Entered: 10/28/2019 12:19 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Mr. William J. Adams, Mr. Kathleen J. Aikens, Mr. Ray Aikens, Sr., Mr. Linda Pearl Akridge and Mr. Ronald W. Akridge [19-40899] (AS) [Entered: 10/28/2019 12:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
