David McCallister v. Lorie Davis, Director, et al
| LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH INSTITUTION DIVISION, DIRECTOR'S MEDICAL AND DENTAL DEPARTMENT, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION DIVISION DIRECTOR, JOHN DOE and TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE |
| DAVID H. MCCALLISTER |
| 19-50542 |
| June 12, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| David McCallister v. Lorie Davis, Director, et al |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-50542] (ABT) [Entered: 07/18/2019 03:50 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 5:16-CV-32. Electronic ROA due on 07/17/2019. [19-50542] (MRW) [Entered: 07/02/2019 03:35 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. David H. McCallister to dismiss appeal without prejudice [9089539-2]. [19-50542] (MRW) [Entered: 07/02/2019 03:35 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [9077576-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 08/12/2019 for Appellant David H. McCallister [19-50542] (CMB) [Entered: 06/17/2019 04:21 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. David H. McCallister [19-50542] (CSG) [Entered: 06/12/2019 09:36 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
