Ana Aguilar-De Martinez, et al v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
| PAMELA NICOLE MARTINEZ-AGUILAR, KEREN EUNICE MARTINEZ-AGUILAR, ANA RUTH AGUILAR-DE MARTINEZ and SAMUEL VLADIMIR MARTINEZ-AGUILAR |
| WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 20-60277 |
| April 6, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Virginia M. Lum for party(s) Respondent William P. Barr, U. S. Attorney General, in case 20-60277 [20-60277] (CB) [Entered: 04/06/2020 11:11 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-60277] (Virginia M. Lum ) [Entered: 04/06/2020 10:54 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Robert Kenneth Hoffman for Petitioners Samuel Vladimir Martinez-Aguilar, Ana Ruth Aguilar-De Martinez, Pamela Nicole Martinez-Aguilar and Keren Eunice Martinez-Aguilar, in case 20-60277. [20-60277] (DLJ) [Entered: 04/06/2020 10:45 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Lawrence Erik Rushton for Petitioners Keren Eunice Martinez-Aguilar, Pamela Nicole Martinez-Aguilar, Samuel Vladimir Martinez-Aguilar and Ana Ruth Aguilar-De Martinez in 20-60277. [20-60277] (DLJ) [Entered: 04/06/2020 10:31 AM] |
| IMMIGRATION CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioners Ms. Ana Ruth Aguilar-De Martinez, Ms. Keren Eunice Martinez-Aguilar, Ms. Pamela Nicole Martinez-Aguilar and Mr. Samuel Vladimir Martinez-Aguilar. Date received in 5th Circuit: 04/03/2020. Immigration File Number: a209 305 288,a209 305 288,a209 305 289,a209 305 296,a209 305 297 Administrative Record due on 05/18/2020 [20-60277] (CB) [Entered: 04/06/2020 09:17 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
