John Hale v. Frank Shaw, Warden
JOHN HALE |
FRANK SHAW, Warden |
20-60360 |
May 6, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
COURT ORDER granting jurisdictional review to remand case [9321491-2] [20-60360] (MAS) [Entered: 06/01/2020 11:47 AM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [20-60360] (MCS) [Entered: 05/27/2020 03:45 PM] |
PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. John Hale [20-60360] (MCS) [Entered: 05/06/2020 11:51 AM] |
CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9307786-2] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. John Hale. [9307786-1] [20-60360] (MCS) [Entered: 05/06/2020 12:06 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: John Hale v. Frank Shaw, Warden | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: JOHN HALE | |
Represented By: | John Hale |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: FRANK SHAW, Warden | |
Represented By: | Emily Burch |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.