Goodno v. Endurance American
Defendant / Appellee: Endurance American Specialty Insurance Company, Anthony P. Sciambra and Mosquito Control Services, L.L.C.
Plaintiff / Appellant: Rebekah Goodno, as personal representative of the Estate of Timothy Paul Thompson and Danielle Thompson
Case Number: 21-30071
Filed: February 4, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 24, 2021 Goodno v. Endurance American

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2021 PROPOSED SUFFICIENT BRIEF filed by Appellant Ms. Rebekah Goodno [ # 9537799-2 ] Date of service: 03/31/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Garmon, Kane; Attorney for Appellees: Gaudin, Peacocke, Teske [21-30071] (Matthew Gregory Garmon ) [Entered: 03/31/2021 03:26 PM]
March 29, 2021 RECORD EXCERPTS FILED. # of Copies Provided: 0. [21-30071] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RECORD EXCERPTS FILED by Appellant Ms. Rebekah Goodno. Date of service: 03/29/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Garmon, Kane; Attorney for Appellees: Gaudin, Peacocke, Teske [21-30071] (Matthew Gregory Garmon ) [Entered: 03/29/2021 04:25 PM]
March 29, 2021 SUFFICIENT APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED. # of Copies Provided: 0. Sufficient Brief deadline satisfied. [21-30071] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED. Brief NOT Sufficient as it requires the proper citations to the record. The use of Id. is not allowed when citing to the record on appeal. Instructions to Attorney: PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. # of Copies Provided: 0. A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Sufficient Brief due on 04/12/2021 for Appellant Rebekah Goodno.. Appellee's Brief due on 04/28/2021 for Appellees Endurance American Specialty Insurance Company, Mosquito Control Services, L.L.C. and Anthony P. Sciambra [21-30071] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Ms. Rebekah Goodno. Date of service: 03/29/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Garmon, Kane; Attorney for Appellees: Gaudin, Peacocke, Teske [21-30071] (Matthew Gregory Garmon ) [Entered: 03/29/2021 03:36 PM]
March 2, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Christopher Rutledge Teske for Appellee Endurance American Specialty Insurance Company in 21-30071 [21-30071] (WMJ) [Entered: 03/02/2021 08:56 AM]
February 24, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Christopher Rutledge Teske, Esq. for Endurance American Specialty Insurance Company for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-30071] (Christopher Rutledge Teske ) [Entered: 02/24/2021 12:17 PM]
February 23, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Matthew Gregory Garmon for Appellant Rebekah Goodno in 21-30071 [21-30071] (WMJ) [Entered: 02/23/2021 12:13 PM]
February 23, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Andre' Collins Gaudin for Appellee Mosquito Control Services, L.L.C. in 21-30071 [21-30071] (WMJ) [Entered: 02/23/2021 12:22 PM]
February 22, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Lee Morgan Peacocke for Appellee Anthony P. Sciambra in 21-30071 [21-30071] (WMJ) [Entered: 02/22/2021 03:18 PM]
February 22, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Lee Morgan Peacocke, Esq. for Mr. Anthony P. Sciambra for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-30071] (Lee Morgan Peacocke ) [Entered: 02/22/2021 02:29 PM]
February 22, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Matthew Gregory Garmon for Ms. Rebekah Goodno for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-30071] (Matthew Gregory Garmon ) [Entered: 02/22/2021 10:41 AM]
February 22, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Andre' Collins Gaudin, Esq. for Mosquito Control Services, L.L.C. for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-30071] (Andre' Collins Gaudin ) [Entered: 02/22/2021 10:19 AM]
February 17, 2021 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. SPECIAL ISSUES TO BE BRIEFED. A/Pet's Brief Due on 03/29/2021 for Appellant Rebekah Goodno. [21-30071] (DDL) [Entered: 02/15/2021 03:19 PM]
February 17, 2021 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-30071] (DDL) [Entered: 02/15/2021 03:18 PM]
February 15, 2021 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. [21-30071] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Ms. Rebekah Goodno advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 02/15/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Garmon, Kane; Attorney for Appellees: Gaudin, Peacocke, Teske [21-30071] (Matthew Gregory Garmon ) [Entered: 02/15/2021 02:31 PM]
February 15, 2021 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. [21-30071] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Ms. Rebekah Goodno advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 02/15/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Garmon, Kane; Attorney for Appellees: Gaudin, Peacocke, Teske [21-30071] (Matthew Gregory Garmon ) [Entered: 02/15/2021 02:28 PM]
February 11, 2021 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: OK to Process with Special Issues to be Briefed. [9502857-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [21-30071] (AGL) [Entered: 02/11/2021 02:50 PM]
February 11, 2021 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:19-CV-11221. Electronic ROA due on 02/26/2021. [21-30071] (AGL) [Entered: 02/11/2021 02:53 PM]
February 4, 2021 PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Rebekah Goodno [21-30071] (AGL) [Entered: 02/04/2021 03:48 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Goodno v. Endurance American
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Endurance American Specialty Insurance Company
Represented By: Christopher Rutledge Teske Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Anthony P. Sciambra
Represented By: Lee Morgan Peacocke Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Mosquito Control Services, L.L.C.
Represented By: Andre' Collins Gaudin Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Rebekah Goodno, as personal representative of the Estate of Timothy Paul Thompson and Danielle Thompson
Represented By: Christopher J. Kane Esq.
Represented By: Matthew Gregory Garmon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?