Geolink Limited v. Mahmood
| Geolink Limited (U.K.) |
| Mazhar Mahmood, Prime Downhole Holdings, L.L.C., Prime Downhole Manufacturing, L.L.C., Prime Downhole Manufacturing, L.L.C., doing business as Tensor Drilling Technologies and Post Oak Energy Capital, L.P. |
| 22-20354 |
| July 13, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Recovery/Enforcement |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER granting Motion to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 filed by Appellant Geolink Limited (U.K.) [ # 9895910-2 ] [22-20354] (SDH) [Entered: 07/20/2022 08:24 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney J. David Cabello for Appellant Geolink Limited (U.K.) in 22-20354 [22-20354] (SDH) [Entered: 07/20/2022 10:00 AM] |
| UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Geolink Limited (U.K.) to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 [9895910-2]. Date of service: 07/19/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Cabello; Attorney for Appellee: Stanfield [22-20354] (J. David Cabello ) [Entered: 07/19/2022 03:26 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. J. David Cabello, Esq. for Geolink Limited (U.K.) for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-20354] (J. David Cabello ) [Entered: 07/19/2022 03:16 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: OK to Process with Special Issues to be Briefed. [9895653-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 08/03/2022 for Appellant Geolink Limited (U.K.) [22-20354] (SDH) [Entered: 07/19/2022 01:20 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Geolink Limited (U.K.) [22-20354] (SDH) [Entered: 07/13/2022 03:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
