Wadhams v. AFT
| Sabrina Marie Wadhams |
| American Federation of Teachers, Corpus Christi American Federation of Teachers, Corpus Christi Independent School District and Texas American Federation of Teachers |
| 22-40246 |
| April 21, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Contract Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Arlene Palmira Gonzalez for party(s) Appellee Corpus Christi Independent School District, in case 22-40246 [22-40246] (ABT) [Entered: 06/02/2022 07:55 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Rebecca S. Bailey for Appellee Corpus Christi Independent School District in 22-40246 [22-40246] (ABT) [Entered: 06/01/2022 01:19 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Rebecca S. Bailey for Corpus Christi Independent School District for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-40246] (Rebecca S. Bailey ) [Entered: 05/31/2022 02:17 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-40246] (Arlene Palmira Gonzalez ) [Entered: 05/31/2022 02:21 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-40246] (CMB) [Entered: 05/24/2022 11:46 AM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 07/05/2022 for Appellant Sabrina Marie Wadhams. [22-40246] (CMB) [Entered: 05/24/2022 11:46 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:20-CV-260. Electronic ROA due on 06/03/2022. [22-40246] (RLL) [Entered: 05/19/2022 09:08 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Ms. Sabrina Marie Wadhams advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. [22-40246] (RLL) [Entered: 05/19/2022 09:07 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER granting Motion to reopen case filed by Appellant Ms. Sabrina Marie Wadhams [ # 9850025-2 ] [22-40246] (RLL) [Entered: 05/19/2022 09:02 AM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Sabrina Marie Wadhams to reopen case [9850025-2] Default Remedied. Date of service: 05/17/2022 [22-40246] (RLL) [Entered: 05/18/2022 12:00 PM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Party information modified for Sabrina Marie Wadhams in 22-40246. Update: attorney for Appellant - Mark Ellis O'Brien - not admitted to 5CCA; appellant changed to pro se w/o attorney. [22-40246] (RLL) [Entered: 05/18/2022 11:58 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to order transcript and make financial arrangements with court reporter[9848707-2] [22-40246] (RLL) [Entered: 05/17/2022 10:09 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Matthew Bradley Bachop for Appellee Texas American Federation of Teachers in 22-40246, Attorney Matthew Bradley Bachop for Appellee Corpus Christi American Federation of Teachers in 22-40246, Attorney Matthew Bradley Bachop for Appellee American Federation of Teachers in 22-40246 [22-40246] (ABT) [Entered: 05/10/2022 04:25 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Matthew Bradley Bachop for American Federation of Teachers, Corpus Christi American Federation of Teachers and Texas American Federation of Teachers for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-40246] (Matthew Bradley Bachop ) [Entered: 05/09/2022 10:34 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9832764-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Transcript order due on 05/11/2022 for Appellant Sabrina Marie Wadhams [22-40246] (RLL) [Entered: 04/26/2022 04:28 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Sabrina Marie Wadhams [22-40246] (ABT) [Entered: 04/21/2022 02:18 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
