Barbee v. Collier
| Stephen Dale Barbee |
| Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin and Dennis Crowley |
| 22-70011 |
| November 4, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| SUPREME COURT ORDER received denying petition for writ of certiorari filed by Appellee Mr. Stephen Dale Barbee in 22-70011 on 11/16/2022. [9991519-1] [22-70011] (SCV) [Entered: 11/29/2022 08:54 AM] |
| SUPREME COURT NOTICE that petition for writ of certiorari [9985293-2] was filed by Appellee Mr. Stephen Dale Barbee on 11/14/2022. Supreme Court Number: 22-6054. [22-70011] (SBS) [Entered: 11/17/2022 09:43 AM] |
| PROPOSED SUFFICIENT BRIEF filed by Appellee Mr. Stephen Dale Barbee [ # 9981495-2 ] Date of service: 11/11/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Ellis, Schardl; Attorney for Appellant: Hoffman [22-70011] (Allen Richard Ellis ) [Entered: 11/11/2022 10:48 AM] |
| UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [22-70011 Vacated and Remanded] Judge: JLD , Judge: JWE , Judge: DRW [22-70011] (AGL) [Entered: 11/11/2022 05:58 PM] |
| JUDGMENT ENTERED AND FILED. [22-70011] (AGL) [Entered: 11/11/2022 06:04 PM] |
| MANDATE ISSUED FORTHWITH. [22-70011] (AGL) [Entered: 11/11/2022 06:15 PM] |
| APPELLEE'S BRIEF FILED Additionally the Brief requires removal of Id as to record citations. # of Copies Provided: 0 E/Res's Brief deadline satisfied. Sufficient Brief due on 11/16/2022 for Appellee Stephen Dale Barbee. [22-70011] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLEE'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Stephen Dale Barbee. Date of service: 11/10/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Ellis, Schardl; Attorney for Appellant: Hoffman [22-70011] (Allen Richard Ellis ) [Entered: 11/10/2022 06:26 PM] |
| PROPOSED SUFFICIENT RECORD EXCERPTS filed by Appellants Mr. Bryan Collier, Mr. Dennis Crowley and Mr. Bobby Lumpkin [ # 9979056-2 ] Date of service: 11/09/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Ellis, Schardl; Attorney for Appellant: Hoffman [22-70011] (Stephen M. Hoffman ) [Entered: 11/09/2022 10:34 AM] |
| SUFFICIENT RECORD EXCERPTS FILED. Sufficient Record Excerpts deadline satisfied [22-70011] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RECORD EXCERPTS FILED. Record Excerpts NOT Sufficient as they require need notice of appeal, district court's docket entries, order seeking review, certificate of service and over optional page limitation. Instructions to Attorney: PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. Sufficient Record Excerpts due on 11/09/2022 for Appellee Stephen Dale Barbee and Appellants Bryan Collier, Dennis Crowley and Bobby Lumpkin [22-70011] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RECORD EXCERPTS FILED by Appellants Mr. Bryan Collier, Mr. Dennis Crowley and Mr. Bobby Lumpkin. Date of service: 11/08/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Ellis, Schardl; Attorney for Appellant: Hoffman [22-70011] (Stephen M. Hoffman ) [Entered: 11/08/2022 12:38 PM] |
| APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied [22-70011] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Bryan Collier, Mr. Dennis Crowley and Mr. Bobby Lumpkin. Date of service: 11/08/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Ellis, Schardl; Attorney for Appellant: Hoffman [22-70011] (Stephen M. Hoffman ) [Entered: 11/08/2022 12:35 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Tivon Schardl for Appellee Stephen Dale Barbee in 22-70011 [22-70011] (MRW) [Entered: 11/07/2022 02:52 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Tivon Schardl for Mr. Stephen Dale Barbee for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-70011] (Tivon Schardl ) [Entered: 11/07/2022 02:46 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Allen Richard Ellis for Appellee Stephen Dale Barbee in 22-70011 [22-70011] (MRW) [Entered: 11/07/2022 08:38 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Stephen M. Hoffman for Mr. Bryan Collier, Mr. Dennis Crowley and Mr. Bobby Lumpkin for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-70011] (Stephen M. Hoffman ) [Entered: 11/04/2022 03:12 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:21-CV-3077. Electronic ROA due on 11/21/2022. [22-70011] (MRW) [Entered: 11/04/2022 02:23 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9977113-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [22-70011] (MRW) [Entered: 11/04/2022 02:22 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Stephen M. Hoffman for Appellant Dennis Crowley in 22-70011, Attorney Stephen M. Hoffman for Appellant Bobby Lumpkin in 22-70011, Attorney Stephen M. Hoffman for Appellant Bryan Collier in 22-70011 [22-70011] (MRW) [Entered: 11/04/2022 03:47 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-70011] (Allen Richard Ellis ) [Entered: 11/04/2022 06:01 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. EXPEDITED SCHEDULE. A/Pet's Brief Due on 11/08/2022 for Appellants Bryan Collier, Dennis Crowley and Bobby Lumpkin.. Appellee's Brief due on 11/10/2022 for Appellee Stephen Dale Barbee.. Reply Brief due on 11/14/2022 for Appellants Bryan Collier, Dennis Crowley and Bobby Lumpkin. [22-70011] (MRW) [Entered: 11/04/2022 06:13 PM] |
| DEATH PENALTY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Mr. Bryan Collier, Mr. Dennis Crowley and Mr. Bobby Lumpkin [22-70011] (MRW) [Entered: 11/04/2022 01:20 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-70011] (MRW) [Entered: 11/04/2022 04:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
