Ricks v. Hooper
| Wesley Sinclair Ricks |
| Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary and State of Louisiana |
| 23-30749 |
| October 25, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 42.3.1, the appeal is subject to dismissal in 15 days for failure to comply with the initial written deadline. Motion due deadline updated to 12/21/2023 for Appellant Wesley Sinclair Ricks. Brief in Support deadline updated to 12/21/2023 for Appellant Wesley Sinclair Ricks. [23-30749] (SEP) [Entered: 12/12/2023 11:03 AM] |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-30749] (DDL) [Entered: 11/14/2023 07:54 AM] |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:23-CV-152. Electronic ROA due on 11/13/2023. [23-30749] (RCB) [Entered: 10/27/2023 08:43 AM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Motion due on 12/06/2023 for Appellant Wesley Sinclair Ricks. Brief in Support due on 12/06/2023 for Appellant Wesley Sinclair Ricks [23-30749] (RCB) [Entered: 10/27/2023 08:39 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Wesley Sinclair Ricks [23-30749] (RCB) [Entered: 10/25/2023 10:12 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
