R.J. Reynolds Vapor v. FDA
Petitioner: R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, RJR Vapor Company, L.L.C., Avail Vapor Texas, L.L.C. and Mississippi Petroleum Marketers and Convenience Stores Association
Respondent: Food & Drug Administration, Robert Califf, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the United States Food & Drug Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services and Xavier Becerra, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Case Number: 23-60037
Filed: January 24, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 23, 2023 Summary R.J. Reynolds Vapor v. FDA

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2023 Filing 26 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-60037] (Noah T. Katzen ) [Entered: 01/25/2023 07:51 PM]
January 25, 2023 Filing 25 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [23-60037] (Ryan Jeffrey Watson ) [Entered: 01/25/2023 04:36 PM]
January 25, 2023 Filing 22 COURT ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Petitioners' opposed motion for a temporary administrative stay of FDA's marketing denial order, as it pertains to menthol Vuse Vibe, is GRANTED as a temporary stay pending (a) the filing of a motion to stay by February 1, 2023 and (b) further order of the court. filed by Petitioners R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, RJR Vapor Company, L.L.C., Avail Vapor Texas, L.L.C. and Mississippi Petroleum Marketers and Convenience Stores Association [ # 9 ] [23-60037] (MAS) [Entered: 01/25/2023 03:33 PM]
January 25, 2023 Filing 20 COURT ORDER granting Motion to place motion under seal filed by Petitioners R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, RJR Vapor Company, L.L.C., Avail Vapor Texas, L.L.C. and Mississippi Petroleum Marketers and Convenience Stores Association [ # 10 ]; granting Motion to file a redacted motion filed by Petitioners R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, RJR Vapor Company, L.L.C., Avail Vapor Texas, L.L.C. and Mississippi Petroleum Marketers and Convenience Stores Association [ # 10 ] [23-60037] (MAS) [Entered: 01/25/2023 01:59 PM]
January 25, 2023 Filing 16 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [23-60037] (Christian George Vergonis ) [Entered: 01/25/2023 01:05 PM]
January 25, 2023 Filing 10 UNOPPOSED MOTION to place motion for stay under seal [10] and file a redacted motion [10] filed by Petitioners Avail Vapor Texas, L.L.C., Mississippi Petroleum Marketers and Convenience Stores Association, R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company and RJR Vapor Company, L.L.C. Date of service: 01/25/2023. [23-60037] (CAG) [Entered: 01/25/2023 11:44 AM]
January 25, 2023 Filing 9 OPPOSED MOTION filed by Petitioners Avail Vapor Texas, L.L.C., Mississippi Petroleum Marketers and Convenience Stores Association, R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company and RJR Vapor Company, L.L.C. for stay pending review. [9]. Ruling is requested by: 01/25/2023. Date of service: 01/25/2023. Response/Opposition due on 02/06/2023. [23-60037] (CAG) [Entered: 01/25/2023 11:41 AM]
January 25, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION AND/OR DOCUMENT UNDER TEMPORARY SEAL pending a ruling by the court filed by Petitioners Avail Vapor Texas, L.L.C., Mississippi Petroleum Marketers and Convenience Stores Association, R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company and RJR Vapor Company, L.L.C. (Motion to Seal Petitioners' Emergency Motion for Temporary Administrative Stay and Addendum) This document is unopposed. Date of service: 01/25/2023 via email - Attorney for Respondents: Bagenstos, Raza, Vicente; Attorney for Petitioner: Francisco [23-60037] (Noel John Francisco ) [Entered: 01/25/2023 11:29 AM]
January 25, 2023 Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Noel John Francisco for Avail Vapor Texas, L.L.C., Mississippi Petroleum Marketers and Convenience Stores Association, R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company and RJR Vapor Company, L.L.C. for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-60037] (Noel John Francisco ) [Entered: 01/25/2023 10:41 AM]
January 25, 2023 Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [23-60037] (CAG) [Entered: 01/25/2023 10:29 AM]
January 24, 2023 Filing 1 AGENCY CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioners Avail Vapor Texas, L.L.C., Mississippi Petroleum Marketers and Convenience Stores Association, R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company and RJR Vapor Company, L.L.C. Date received in 5th Circuit: 01/24/2023. Administrative Record due on 03/06/2023 [23-60037] (CAG) [Entered: 01/24/2023 04:22 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: R.J. Reynolds Vapor v. FDA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company
Represented By: Noel John Francisco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: RJR Vapor Company, L.L.C.
Represented By: Noel John Francisco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Avail Vapor Texas, L.L.C.
Represented By: Noel John Francisco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Mississippi Petroleum Marketers and Convenience Stores Association
Represented By: Noel John Francisco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Food & Drug Administration
Represented By: Mark Raza
Represented By: Wendy S. Vicente
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Robert Califf, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the United States Food & Drug Administration
Represented By: Mark Raza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States Department of Health and Human Services
Represented By: Samuel R. Bagenstos Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Xavier Becerra, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Represented By: Samuel R. Bagenstos Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?