Panus v. Lumpkin
| Justin Panus |
| Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
| 24-50588 |
| July 23, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 CLERK ORDER granting Motion to extend time to comply with COA requirements filed by Appellant Mr. Justin Panus [ # 13 ] Motion due deadline updated to 10/23/2024 for Appellant Justin Panus. Brief in Support deadline updated to 10/23/2024 for Appellant Justin Panus [24-50588] (ABT) [Entered: 09/17/2024 10:11 AM] |
| Filing 13 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Justin Panus to extend time to comply with COA requirements until 10/23/2024 [13]. Date of service: 09/09/2024 [24-50588] (MBC) [Entered: 09/16/2024 03:08 PM] |
| Filing 12 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [24-50588] (DDL) [Entered: 09/06/2024 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 11 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 1:23-CV-999. Electronic ROA due on 08/28/2024. [24-50588] (MBC) [Entered: 08/13/2024 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 10 LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 09/23/2024 for Appellant Justin Panus. Brief in Support due on 09/23/2024 for Appellant Justin Panus [24-50588] (MBC) [Entered: 08/13/2024 02:55 PM] |
| Filing 9 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 08/13/2024 granting IFP for Appellant Mr. Justin Panus. [24-50588] (MBC) [Entered: 08/13/2024 02:54 PM] |
| Filing 8 DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Mr. Justin Panus. Fee deadline satisfied [24-50588] (MBC) [Entered: 08/13/2024 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Stephanie Wawrzynski for Appellee Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division in 24-50588. [24-50588] (RLL) [Entered: 07/29/2024 12:09 PM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Stephanie Wawrzynski for Mr. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [24-50588] (Stephanie Wawrzynski ) [Entered: 07/26/2024 01:01 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 08/12/2024 for Appellant Justin Panus [24-50588] (AMD) [Entered: 07/26/2024 09:12 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Justin Panus [24-50588] (MFY) [Entered: 07/23/2024 08:39 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Panus v. Lumpkin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division | |
| Represented By: | Stephanie Wawrzynski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Justin Panus | |
| Represented By: | Justin Panus |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
