Cleveland Jackson v. Marc Houk
Petitioner - Appellant: CLEVELAND R. JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee: MARC C. HOUK, Warden
Case Number: 08-3677
Filed: May 28, 2008
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 24, 2012 Summary Cleveland Jackson v. Marc Houk

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6111378380 OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Gilbert S. Merritt (AUTHORING), Boyce F. Martin, Jr., and John M. Rogers, Circuit Judges.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Cleveland Jackson v. Marc Houk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: CLEVELAND R. JACKSON
Represented By: James A. Jenkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: MARC C. HOUK, Warden
Represented By: Thomas E. Madden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?