Robert Woodall v. Thomas Simpson
| ROBERT KEITH WOODALL |
| THOMAS L. SIMPSON, Warden |
| 09-5352 |
| March 26, 2009 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6111366683
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED and the case is REMANDED with instructions to conditionally grant the writ unless the State of Kentucky elects to initiate resentencing proceedings within 180 days of the district court's order. Decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Boyce F. Martin , Jr. (AUTHORING), Deborah L. Cook (DISSENTING), and Richard Allen Griffin, Circuit Judges. [09-5352, 09-5406]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Robert Woodall v. Thomas Simpson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner - appellee cross-appellant: ROBERT KEITH WOODALL | |
| Represented By: | Laurence E. Komp |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent - appellant cross-appellee: THOMAS L. SIMPSON, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Susan Roncarti Lenz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
