USA v. Tracy Feagan
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: TRACY FEAGAN
Case Number: 09-5516
Filed: April 28, 2009
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 9, 2012 USA v. Tracy Feagan

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6111269053 OPINION filed : we AFFIRM the jury's verdict and the district court proceedings below, decision not for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Cornelia G. Kennedy, Circuit Judge authoring; Julia Smith Gibbons, Circuit Judge and Raymond M. Kethledge, Circuit Judge.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Tracy Feagan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Steven S. Neff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: TRACY FEAGAN
Represented By: Tracy Feagan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?