USA v. Marvin Harris
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: MARVIN HARRIS
Case Number: 09-6467
Filed: December 8, 2009
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
November 1, 2011 USA v. Marvin Harris

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 6111115736 OPINION filed :Harris's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED, decision not for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Danny J. Boggs, Circuit Judge; Eugene E. Siler , Jr., Circuit Judge and Gregory F. Van Tatenhove, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation, Authoring.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Marvin Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: David P. Lewen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: MARVIN HARRIS
Represented By: Marvin Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?