Dallas Cobbs v. George Pramstaller, et al
Defendant: CRAIG HUTCHINSON, Doctor, et al
Plaintiff - Appellee: DALLAS COBBS
Defendant - Appellant: GEORGE PRAMSTALLER, Chief Medical Officer, Michigan Department of Corrections
Case Number: 10-2089
Filed: August 25, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 10, 2012 Dallas Cobbs v. George Pramstaller

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Dallas Cobbs v. George Pramstaller, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: DALLAS COBBS
Represented By: Paul D. Reingold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: GEORGE PRAMSTALLER, Chief Medical Officer, Michigan Department of Corrections
Represented By: Clifton B. Schneider
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CRAIG HUTCHINSON, Doctor, et al
Represented By: Anthony D. Pignotti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?