Reginald Worthy v. Michigan Bell Telephone Compan
Defendant: MICHAEL LUSTIG
Plaintiff - Appellant: REGINALD WORTHY
Defendant - Appellee: MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, dba AT&T Michigan
Case Number: 10-2441
Filed: November 2, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 21, 2012 Reginald Worthy v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Reginald Worthy v. Michigan Bell Telephone Compan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: REGINALD WORTHY
Represented By: Elias Muawad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL LUSTIG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, dba AT&T Michigan
Represented By: Vicki J. Patterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?