Efraim Garcia v. Carmen Palmer
Petitioner - Appellant: EFRAIM GARCIA
Respondent - Appellee: CARMEN PALMER, Warden
Case Number: 10-2685
Filed: December 27, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 9, 2013 Efraim Garcia v. Carmen Palmer

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 6111779647 OPINION filed : the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED, decision not for publication. Alice M. Batchelder, Chief Circuit Judge; Damon J. Keith, Circuit Judge and Boyce F. Martin , Jr., Circuit Judge (Authoring).
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Efraim Garcia v. Carmen Palmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: EFRAIM GARCIA
Represented By: Harold Z. Gurewitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: CARMEN PALMER, Warden
Represented By: Laura A. Cook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?