USA v. Cedrick Stubblefield
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: CEDRICK STUBBLEFIELD
Case Number: 10-3587
Filed: May 7, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 19, 2012 Summary USA v. Cedrick Stubblefield

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6111340836 OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The judgments of the district court with respect to Earvin and Spigner are AFFIRMED. The judgment with respect to Stubblefield's sentence is VACATED and REMANDED for resentencing. Decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Ronald Lee Gilman, John M. Rogers, and Jane Branstetter Stranch (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges. [10-3587, 10-3588, 10-3589]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Cedrick Stubblefield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Gregory C. Sasse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: CEDRICK STUBBLEFIELD
Represented By: Vanessa Faye Malone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?