Donavon Huff v. USA
Petitioner - Appellant: DONAVON E. HUFF
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 10-3903
Filed: July 29, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
November 5, 2013 Summary Huff v. United States

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 6111873459 OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The denial of Huff's motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255 is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings. Decision for publication. David W. McKeague and Bernice Bouie Donald, Circuit Judges; David M. Lawson (AUTHORING), U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Donavon Huff v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: DONAVON E. HUFF
Represented By: Donavon E. Huff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Robert William Kern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?