Johnnie Reeves v. James Fortner
Petitioner - Appellant: JOHNNIE WAYNE REEVES
Respondent - Appellee: JAMES FORTNER, Warden
Case Number: 10-5270
Filed: March 15, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 2, 2012 Johnnie Reeves v. James Fortner

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6111388198 OPINION filed :The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED, decision not for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Boyce F. Martin , Jr., Circuit Judge, Authoring; David W. McKeague, Circuit Judge and Karen K. Caldwell, U.S. District Judge.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Johnnie Reeves v. James Fortner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: JOHNNIE WAYNE REEVES
Represented By: Hugh M. Mundy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: JAMES FORTNER, Warden
Represented By: Andrew H. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?