Armando Albo v. USA
Petitioner - Appellant: ARMANDO RAMIREZ ALBO
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 10-5272
Filed: March 15, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 29, 2012 Armando Albo v. USA

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6111416306 OPINION filed : The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED, decision not for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Eugene E. Siler , Jr., Circuit Judge; John M. Rogers, Circuit Judge, Authoring and Helene N. White, Circuit Judge, dissenting.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Armando Albo v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: ARMANDO RAMIREZ ALBO
Represented By: Armando Ramirez Albo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Charles P. Wisdom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?