David Ellis v. State of Tennessee
| DAVID ELLIS |
| STATE OF TENNESSEE |
| 10-6103 |
| September 9, 2010 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| David Ellis v. State of Tennessee |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6111394061
OPINION filed : The district court's denial of Ellis's motion for summary judgment on the fact that Tennessee was his employer is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion, decision not for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Boyce F. Martin , Jr., Circuit Judge, Authoring; Richard F. Suhrheinrich, Circuit Judge and R. Guy Cole , Jr., Circuit Judge.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: David Ellis v. State of Tennessee | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: DAVID ELLIS | |
| Represented By: | Douglas B. Janney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: STATE OF TENNESSEE | |
| Represented By: | Jay C. Ballard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
