Wayne LaFountain v. Shirlee Harry, et al
| WAYNE EARL LAFOUNTAIN |
| SHIRLEE HARRY, Warden, Warden, Muskegon Correctional Facility, et al |
| 11-1496 |
| April 18, 2011 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6111697492
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The judgment of the district court is REVERSED IN PART and VACATED IN PART, and the case REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings. Decision for publication. Karen Nelson Moore, Julia Smith Gibbons, and Raymond M. Kethledge (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Wayne LaFountain v. Shirlee Harry, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: WAYNE EARL LAFOUNTAIN | |
| Represented By: | Wayne Earl LaFountain |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: SHIRLEE HARRY, Warden, Warden, Muskegon Correctional Facility, et al | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
