Carrie Warf v. United States Department of Ve
CARRIE M. WARF |
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS |
11-2570 |
December 14, 2011 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Warf v. U.S. Dep't of Veterans Affairs |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6111651488 OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Decision for publication. Boyce F. Martin, Jr. (AUTHORING) and Richard Allen Griffin, Circuit Judges; and Sandra S. Beckwith, Senior U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation. |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Carrie Warf v. United States Department of Ve | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: CARRIE M. WARF | |
Represented By: | Jennifer Lynn Brant |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS | |
Represented By: | Vanessa M. Mays |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.