Alfred Cleveland v. Margaret Bradshaw
Petitioner - Appellant: ALFRED CLEVELAND
Respondent - Appellee: MARGARET BRADSHAW, Warden
Case Number: 11-3162
Filed: February 16, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 10, 2012 Summary Cleveland v. Bradshaw

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6111426525 OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The judgment of the district court is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED. Decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Boyce F. Martin, Jr., Ronald Lee Gilman, and Helene N. White (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Alfred Cleveland v. Margaret Bradshaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: ALFRED CLEVELAND
Represented By: Jennifer Paschen Bergeron
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: MARGARET BRADSHAW, Warden
Represented By: Jerri L. Fosnaught
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?