Frank Boggio v. USAA Federal Savings Bank
Plaintiff - Appellant: FRANK BOGGIO
Defendant - Appellee: USAA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK
Case Number: 11-4040
Filed: September 30, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 27, 2012 Summary Boggio v. USAA Fed.l Sav. Bank

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6111447578 OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The judgment of the district court is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED. Decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Gilbert S. Merritt, Karen Nelson Moore (AUTHORING), and David W. McKeague, Circuit Judges.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Frank Boggio v. USAA Federal Savings Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: FRANK BOGGIO
Represented By: Stephen R. Felson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: USAA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK
Represented By: Nicholas J. Dertouzos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?