Daniel Greenberg v. Procter & Gamble Company, et al
In re: DRY MAX PAMPERS LITIGATION |
DANIEL GREENBERG |
ANGELA CLARK, et al. |
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, PROCTER & GAMBLE PAPER PRODUCTS COMPANY and PROCTER & GAMBLE DISTRIBUTING LLC |
11-4156 |
October 26, 2011 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Contract: Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Greenberg v. Procter & Gamble Co. |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6111772741 OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The judgment of the district court is REVERSED, and the case REMANDED. Decision for publication. R. Guy Cole , Jr. (DISSENTING) and Raymond M. Kethledge (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges; and Amul R. Thapar, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation. |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.