USA v. Tommie Stepp
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: TOMMIE STEPP
Case Number: 11-5004
Filed: January 3, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
May 17, 2012 Summary United States v. Stepp

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6111309054 OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, and the case is REMANDED for resentencing. Decision for full-text publication pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206. Damon J. Keith, Danny J. Boggs (CONCURRING IN THE RESULT ONLY), and Karen Nelson Moore (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Tommie Stepp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Joseph C. Murphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: TOMMIE STEPP
Represented By: Doris A. Randle-Holt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?