USA v. James Gamble
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| JAMES D. GAMBLE |
| 11-5394 |
| April 5, 2011 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6111604433
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The restitution orders in Gamble's (11-5394) and Crawford's (11-5544) cases are REMANDED to the district court for proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. It is further ORDERED that Gamble's sentence is AFFIRMED. Decision for publication. John M. Rogers (AUTHORING), Raymond M. Kethledge (CONCURRING IN PART AND IN THE JUDGMENT), Circuit Judges; Algenon L. Marbley, U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation. [11-5394, 11-5544]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. James Gamble | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | John P. MacCoon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: JAMES D. GAMBLE | |
| Represented By: | Laura E. Davis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
