USA v. Michael Martin
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: MICHAEL MARTIN
Case Number: 11-5811
Filed: June 30, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 30, 2012 USA v. Michael Martin

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6111383624 Per Curiam OPINION filed : The district court's denial of Martin's motion to suppress is AFFIRMED. Decision not for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Danny J. Boggs, Circuit Judge; David W. McKeague, Circuit Judge and Michael H. Watson, U.S. District Judge, SDOH.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Michael Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Jennifer Lawrence Webber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: MICHAEL MARTIN
Represented By: Edwin A. Perry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?