Kenneth Seaton v. TripAdvisor, LLC
| KENNETH M. SEATON, dba Grand Resort Hotel and Convention Center |
| TRIPADVISOR, LLC |
| 12-6122 |
| September 21, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| P.I.: Assault, Libel & Slander |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6111800608
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court's judgment granting TripAdvisor's motion to dismiss and its denial of Seaton's motion to amend his complaint are AFFIRMED. Decision for publication. Karen Nelson Moore (AUTHORING), Eric L. Clay, and Helene N. White, Circuit Judges.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Kenneth Seaton v. TripAdvisor, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: KENNETH M. SEATON, dba Grand Resort Hotel and Convention Center | |
| Represented By: | Sidney W. Gilreath |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: TRIPADVISOR, LLC | |
| Represented By: | S. Russell Headrick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
