Gerald Johnson v. Carlos Eggleston, et al

Plaintiff - Appellant: GERALD JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee: CARLOS EGGLESTON, and Individually, CITY OF YOUNGSTOWN and JOHN DOES ONE THROUGH FIVE
Case Number: 13-3446
Filed: April 16, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other

Search for this case: Gerald Johnson v. Carlos Eggleston, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: GERALD JOHNSON
Represented By: Rhys Brendan Cartwright-Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: CARLOS EGGLESTON, and Individually
Represented By: Megan M. Graff
Represented By: Neil David Schor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: CITY OF YOUNGSTOWN
Represented By: Megan M. Graff
Represented By: Neil David Schor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: JOHN DOES ONE THROUGH FIVE
Represented By: Megan M. Graff
Represented By: Neil David Schor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.