Gabino Jacquez-Perez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
GABINO ALONZO JACQUEZ-PEREZ |
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General |
13-3568 |
May 6, 2013 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Gabino Jacquez-Perez v. Eric Holder, Jr. |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6111934672 Per Curiam OPINION filed : we DENY Jacquez-Perez's petition to review the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals, decision not for publication. R. Guy Cole , Jr., Circuit Judge; Ronald Lee Gilman, Circuit Judge and Bernice Bouie Donald, Circuit Judge. |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Gabino Jacquez-Perez v. Eric Holder, Jr. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: GABINO ALONZO JACQUEZ-PEREZ | |
Represented By: | Wendy Nicole Villafana |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General | |
Represented By: | Office of Immigration Litigation |
Represented By: | Emily A. Radford |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.