USA v. Anthony Harri

USA v. Anthony Harri

Plaintiff - Appellee:	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:	ANTHONY HARRIS
Case Number:	13-5489
Filed:	April 16, 2013
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed	Description
January 15, 2014	USA v. Anthony Harris
January 29, 2014	USA v. Anthony Harris

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 29, 2014	Filing 6111949991 AMENDED OPINION filed: We AFFIRM the district court's imposition of a sentencing enhancement under U.S.S.G 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) and AFFIRM the court's implication of the homicide cross-reference gateway provision under 2K2.1(c)(1)(B). We VACATE Harris's sentence and REMAND to the district court for further factual finding and resentencing only with respect to what constituted the "most analogous offense guideline" from 2A1, decision not for publication. R. Guy Cole , Jr., Ronald Lee Gilman and Bernice Bouie Donald, Circuit Judges.
January 15, 2014	Filing 6111936582 OPINION filed : We AFFIRM the district court's imposition of a sentencing enhancement under U.S.S.G 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) and AFFIRM the court's implication of the homicide cross-reference gateway provision under 2K2.1(c)(1)(B). We VACATE Harris's sentence and REMAND to the district court for further factual finding and resentencing only with respect to what constituted the "most analogous offense guideline" from 2A1, decision not for publication. R. Guy Cole , Jr., Ronald Lee Gilman and Bernice Bouie Donald, Circuit Judges.

Date Filed

Document Text

January 29, 2014

Filing 6111949991 AMENDED OPINION filed: We AFFIRM the district court's imposition of a sentencing enhancement under U.S.S.G 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) and AFFIRM the court's implication of the homicide cross-reference gateway provision under 2K2.1(c)(1)(B). We VACATE Harris's sentence and REMAND to the district court for further factual finding and resentencing only with respect to what constituted the "most analogous offense guideline" from 2A1, decision not for publication. R. Guy Cole , Jr., Ronald Lee Gilman and Bernice Bouie Donald, Circuit Judges.

January 15, 2014

Filing 6111936582 OPINION filed : We AFFIRM the district court's imposition of a sentencing enhancement under U.S.S.G 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) and AFFIRM the court's implication of the homicide cross-reference gateway provision under 2K2.1(c)(1)(B). We VACATE Harris's sentence and REMAND to the district court for further factual finding and resentencing only with respect to what constituted the "most analogous offense guideline" from 2A1, decision not for publication. R. Guy Cole , Jr., Ronald Lee Gilman and Bernice Bouie Donald, Circuit Judges.

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Anthony Harri
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By:	Melissa M. Kirby
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: ANTHONY HARRIS
Represented By:	Mark Edwin Brown
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?