National Credit Union Admin v. Cumis Insurance Society Inc
Plaintiff - Appellant: NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION BOARD, As Liquidating Agent of St. Paul Croation Federal Credit Union
Defendant - Appellee: CUMIS INSURANCE SOCIETY INCORPORATED
Case Number: 16-3140
Filed: February 18, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
May 18, 2017 Nat'l Credit Union Admin. v. Cumis Ins.

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: National Credit Union Admin v. Cumis Insurance Society Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION BOARD, As Liquidating Agent of St. Paul Croation Federal Credit Union
Represented By: Samuel Joseph Lauricia
Represented By: Shawn Wayne Maestle
Represented By: Matthew C. Miller
Represented By: Randy Lee Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: CUMIS INSURANCE SOCIETY INCORPORATED
Represented By: Jeffrey Mark Embleton
Represented By: F. Joseph Nealon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?