Norris Hollom v. USA
Petitioner - Appellant: NORRIS HOLLOM
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 16-6461
Filed: September 27, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
May 30, 2018 Norris Hollom v. United States

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6013416323 OPINION filed : AFFIRMED. Decision not for publication. Alan E. Norris (AUTHORING), Alice M. Batchelder, and Jane Branstetter Stranch, Circuit Judges.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Norris Hollom v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: NORRIS HOLLOM
Represented By: Norris Hollom
Represented By: Ruchee Janardan Patel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Samuel Keenan Carter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?