John Greiner v. Macomb County, MI, et al
MICHIGAN AFSCME COUNCIL 25 (AFL-CIO) and MACOMB COUNTY, MI |
JOHN P. GREINER |
19-1055 |
January 10, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER: appeal No. 19-1055 as it applies to the November 13, 2017, judgment is DISMISSED as a duplicate to appeal No. 17-2417. Appeal No. 19-1055 as it applies to the November 13, 2018, order denying the Rule 60(b) motion is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. The district courts December 10, 2018, order is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED with instructions to dismiss Greiners November 30, 2018, Rule 59(e) motion for lack of jurisdiction.. Damon J. Keith, Circuit Judge; Raymond M. Kethledge, Circuit Judge and Amul R. Thapar, Circuit Judge.--[Edited 02/22/2019 by YH] (LAJ) [Entered: 02/22/2019 07:31 AM] |
Filing 5 TRANSCRIPT ORDER filed - transcript is already on file in the District Court Clerks Office. Filed by Mr. John P. Greiner. (LAJ) [Entered: 01/29/2019 01:17 PM] |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Attorney Ms. Karen B. Berkery for Appellee Macomb County, MI Certificate of Service: 01/18/2019. [19-1055] (KBB) [Entered: 01/18/2019 03:39 PM] |
Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee Macomb County, MI by Karen B. Berkery. Certificate of Service: 01/18/2019. [19-1055] (KBB) [Entered: 01/18/2019 03:37 PM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Laura Jones (LAJ) [Entered: 01/10/2019 04:12 PM] |
Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. John P. Greiner. Transcript needed: y. (LAJ) [Entered: 01/10/2019 04:02 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.