Talantbek Akmatov v. William P. Barr
TALANTBEK AKMATOV |
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General and MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting U.S. Attorney General |
19-3058 |
January 18, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Talantbek Akmatov v. William P. Barr |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 RULING LETTER SENT to hold briefing in abeyance, pending receipt of administrative record. (MMP) [Entered: 03/04/2019 02:20 PM] |
Filing 7 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting briefing schedule: petitioner brief due 03/20/2019;. respondent brief due 04/19/2019; (JE) [Entered: 02/08/2019 02:44 PM] |
Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Attorney Mr. Bryan Scott Hicks for Petitioner Talantbek Akmatov Certificate of Service: 02/08/2019. [19-3058] (BSH) [Entered: 02/08/2019 02:38 PM] |
Filing 5 APPEARANCE filed for Petitioner Talantbek Akmatov by Bryan Scott Hicks. Certificate of Service: 02/08/2015. [19-3058] (BSH) [Entered: 02/08/2019 02:36 PM] |
Filing 4 Petition for Review filing fee paid Mr. Bryan Scott Hicks for Talantbek Akmatov. Fee Amount: $500.00 Receipt Number: A06-66686-499.. [19-3058] (BSH) [Entered: 02/01/2019 05:34 PM] |
Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Respondent Matthew G. Whitaker by Timothy Bo Stanton. Certificate of Service: 01/22/2019. [19-3058] (TBS) [Entered: 01/22/2019 10:05 AM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is now: Monica Page (AEG) [Entered: 01/18/2019 05:32 PM] |
Filing 1 Agency Case Docketed. Notice filed by. Originating Case No: A 205 801 510. Petition Received in 6CA: 01/18/2019. (AEG) [Entered: 01/18/2019 05:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.