CONSOL of Kentucky, Inc. v. Bobby Stamper, et al
| CONSOL OF KENTUCKY, INC. |
| BENEFITS REVIEW BOARD, BOBBY STAMPER, DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR |
| 19-3078 |
| January 29, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING motion to dismiss case - voluntarily [ # 5 ] filed by Mr. Joseph D. Halbert. (LAJ) [Entered: 02/11/2019 12:26 PM]
|
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE filed for Petitioner CONSOL of Kentucky, Inc. by Joseph D. Halbert. Certificate of Service: 02/11/2019. [19-3078] (JDH) [Entered: 02/11/2019 09:17 AM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION filed by Mr. Joseph D. Halbert for CONSOL of Kentucky, Inc. to dismiss voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Certificate of Service: 02/08/2019. [19-3078] (JDH) [Entered: 02/08/2019 02:21 PM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE filed for Respondent Bobby Stamper by Evan Barret Smith. Certificate of Service: 02/08/2019. [19-3078] (EBS) [Entered: 02/08/2019 11:40 AM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Respondent OWCP by Michelle S. Gerdano. Certificate of Service: 01/31/2019. [19-3078] (MSG) [Entered: 01/31/2019 11:58 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Laura Jones (LAJ) [Entered: 01/29/2019 03:55 PM] |
| Filing 1 Agency Case Docketed. Notice filed by Petitioner CONSOL of Kentucky, Inc.. Petition Received in 6CA: 01/29/2019. Respondents OWCP, DOL were served via electronic notice, Respondent Bobby Stamper was served via U.S. Postal Service. (LAJ) [Entered: 01/29/2019 03:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
