Cynthia Casilla Arrieta v. William Barr
CYNTHIA VANESSA CASILLA ARRIETA |
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General |
19-3733 |
August 5, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Bryant Crutcher: 513-564-7013. (BLC) [Entered: 08/05/2019 02:50 PM] |
Filing 1 Agency Case Docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioner Cynthia Vanessa Casilla Arrieta. Originating Case No: A 206 399 549. Petition Received in 6CA: 08/05/2019. (BLC) [Entered: 08/05/2019 02:48 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Cynthia Casilla Arrieta v. William Barr | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General | |
Represented By: | Office of Immigration Litigation |
Represented By: | Rosanne M. Perry |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: CYNTHIA VANESSA CASILLA ARRIETA | |
Represented By: | Divyesh Ratilal Gopal |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.