Edgar Flores v. USA
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant: EDGAR LERMA FLORES and EDGAR LERMA FLORES, aka Carlos Alberto Penuelas Rodriguez, aka Carlos Alberto Pencelas Rodriguez
Case Number: 19-5270
Filed: March 20, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 23, 2019 Filing 8 RESPONSE in opposition filed regarding a motion grant certificate of appealability, [ # 5 ]; previously filed by Edgar Lerma Flores. Response from Attorney Mr. Charles P. Wisdom, Jr. for Appellee USA Certificate of Service:04/23/2019. [19-5270] (CPW) [Entered: 04/23/2019 10:52 AM]
April 15, 2019 Filing 9 TRANSCRIPT ORDER FORM filed by Edgar Lerma Flores. District Court Docket Number: 5:18-cv-00484,5:15-cr-00050-6. Date NOA Filed: 03/20/2019,03/20/2019 (ASM) [Entered: 04/23/2019 01:49 PM]
April 15, 2019 Filing 7 RULING LETTER SENT granting motion to extend time to file response to Flores motion for certificate of appealability, [ # 6 ] filed by Mr. Charles P. Wisdom, Jr. (ASM) [Entered: 04/15/2019 04:20 PM]
April 15, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION filed by Mr. Charles P. Wisdom, Jr. for USA to extend time to File Response to Motion for Certificate of Appealability Certificate of Service: 04/15/2019. [19-5270] (CPW) [Entered: 04/15/2019 01:06 PM]
April 11, 2019 Filing 5 Appellant MOTION filed by Edgar Lerma Flores to grant a certificate of appealability. Certificate of service: 04/05/2019. (ASM) [Entered: 04/11/2019 03:43 PM]
March 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Copy of District Court Order filed 3/27/2019, R. #239: ORDER as to Edgar Lerma Flores (6): It is ORDERED that the defendant's (236) Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 3/27/2019. (KM) (ASM) [Entered: 03/27/2019 11:11 AM]
March 22, 2019 Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee USA by Charles P. Wisdom Jr. Certificate of Service: 03/22/2019. [19-5270] (CPW) [Entered: 03/22/2019 01:10 PM]
March 20, 2019 Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Antoinette Macon (ASM) [Entered: 03/20/2019 02:50 PM]
March 20, 2019 Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed with certificate of appealability denied. Notice filed by Appellant Edgar Lerma Flores. Transcript needed: y. (ASM) [Entered: 03/20/2019 02:43 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Edgar Flores v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Roger W. West
Represented By: Charles P. Wisdom Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: EDGAR LERMA FLORES
Represented By: Edgar Lerma Flores
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: EDGAR LERMA FLORES, aka Carlos Alberto Penuelas Rodriguez, aka Carlos Alberto Pencelas Rodriguez
Represented By: Edgar Lerma Flores
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?