Stacey SmithIn re: Stacey Smith
In re: STACEY R. SMITH |
THE HONORABLE GEORGE S. BUTH |
20-1716 |
July 28, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 RULING LETTER SENT directing Movant Stacey R. Smith to file a corrected second successive habeas motion. Due within 30 days. (BLC) [Entered: 07/28/2020 10:30 AM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Bryant Crutcher: 513-564-7013. (BLC) [Entered: 07/28/2020 10:16 AM] |
Filing 1 Motion to File Second or Successive Habeas Case Docketed. Motion filed by Movant Stacey R. Smith. 2nd/Successive Motion Received in 6CA: 07/20/2020. (BLC) [Entered: 07/28/2020 10:15 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Stacey SmithIn re: Stacey Smith | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: THE HONORABLE GEORGE S. BUTH | |
Represented By: | Andrea M. Christensen-Brown |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: STACEY R. SMITH | |
Represented By: | Stacey R. Smith |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.