Jeffrey King v. Tony Mays
JEFFREY KING |
TONY MAYS, Warden |
21-5110 |
February 5, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee Tony Mays by Richard D. Douglas. Certificate of Service: 02/05/2021. [21-5110] (RDD) [Entered: 02/05/2021 06:30 PM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Mr. Roy G. Ford (513) 564-7016 (RGF) [Entered: 02/05/2021 01:18 PM] |
Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed with certificate of appealability denied on January 14, 202. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Jeffrey King. Transcript needed: n. (RGF) [Entered: 02/05/2021 01:13 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Jeffrey King v. Tony Mays | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: JEFFREY KING | |
Represented By: | Jeffrey King |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: TONY MAYS, Warden | |
Represented By: | Richard Davison Douglas |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.