Edward Cromer v. MI Dept of Corr Parole Bd, et al
| EDWARD JAMES CROMER |
| BRIAN SHIPMAN, Board Member, TIMOTHY S. FLANAGAN, Board Member, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, MDOC Director, EDWIN M. HEAP, Board Member, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS PAROLE BOARD, Agency, THOMAS O'BELL WINN, Warden, RANDEE REWERTS, Warden, MATT MACAULEY, Warden, JOHN DAVIDS, Warden and ERICA HUSS, Warden |
| 22-1927 |
| October 17, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Prisoner trust account statement filed. (JAS) [Entered: 11/15/2022 03:56 PM] |
| Filing 7 Financial Affidavit filed by Party Edward James Cromer. Dated: 11/07/2022. (JAS) [Entered: 11/15/2022 03:55 PM] |
| Filing 6 Appellant MOTION filed by to proceed in forma pauperis. Dated: 11/07/2022. (JAS) [Entered: 11/15/2022 03:54 PM] |
| Filing 5 RULING LETTER SENT to extend time to pay fee until 11/28/22. (JAS) [Entered: 10/25/2022 02:52 PM] |
| Filing 4 Copy of District Court Order filed denying in forma pauperis on 10/24/22 at RE #26. (JAS) [Entered: 10/25/2022 02:51 PM] |
| Filing 3 Defendant not served in district court, complaint dismissed prior to service. Michael Eagan not named as party due to no longer named in amended complaint. (JAS) [Entered: 10/17/2022 11:57 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Jennifer Strobel (JAS) [Entered: 10/17/2022 11:54 AM] |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Edward James Cromer. Transcript needed: n. (JAS) [Entered: 10/17/2022 11:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
