Garrett Sorezo v. White House, et al
| GARRETT MJ TALIF SOREZO |
| WHITE HOUSE, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President, GEORGE BUSH, SR., Former President and BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, Former President |
| 22-2036 |
| November 9, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (REO) [Entered: 12/16/2022 02:42 PM] |
Filing 8
ORDER filed to dismiss case for lack of jurisdiction. No mandate to issue, decision not for publication. Alan E. Norris, Circuit Judge; Karen Nelson Moore, Circuit Judge and Ronald Lee Gilman, Circuit Judge. (REO) [Entered: 12/16/2022 02:36 PM]
|
| Filing 7 APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Mr. Garrett MJ Talif Sorezo Certificate of Service:11/27/2022. Argument Request: not received. (REO) [Entered: 12/06/2022 12:04 PM] |
| Filing 6 RULING LETTER SENT to hold briefing in abeyance pending jurisdictional review. (REO) [Entered: 12/02/2022 09:58 AM] |
| Filing 5 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting pro se briefing schedule: appellant brief due 01/04/2023. (REO) [Entered: 11/22/2022 11:13 AM] |
| Filing 4 Copy of District Court Order filed granting in forma pauperis. Order filed 11/21/2022. (REO) [Entered: 11/22/2022 11:09 AM] |
| Filing 3 Defendants not served in district court, complaint dismissed prior to service. (REO) [Entered: 11/09/2022 12:24 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Ryan Orme (REO) [Entered: 11/09/2022 12:24 PM] |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Garrett MJ Talif Sorezo. Transcript needed: n. (REO) [Entered: 11/09/2022 12:22 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
