Ryohei Akima v. Caitlyn Peca
| RYOHEI AKIMA |
| CAITLYN M. PECA, individually and in her official capactiy as a Public Safety Officer |
| 22-2058 |
| November 22, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 BRIEFING LETTER SENT by Mediation Office, resetting briefing schedule: appellant brief now due 02/07/2023. appellee brief now due 03/09/2023. (MLB) [Entered: 01/09/2023 11:43 AM] |
| Filing 16 Letter sent by Mediation Office REGARDING MEDIATION: The Mediation Conference scheduled for 01/09/2023 is hereby canceled. (MLB) [Entered: 01/09/2023 11:41 AM] |
| Filing 15 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting briefing schedule: appellant brief due 01/24/2023;. appellee brief due 02/23/2023; (RLB) [Entered: 12/15/2022 10:11 AM] |
| Filing 13 TRANSCRIPT ORDER filed - transcript is already on file in the District Court Clerks Office. Filed by Ms. Kali May Lester Henderson for Caitlyn M. Peca. Certificate of Service: 12/14/2022. [22-2058] (KMH) [Entered: 12/14/2022 12:57 PM] |
| Filing 12 NOTICE: The initial transcript order has not been completed. If not completed by 12/15/2022 further action will be taken. (PJE) [Entered: 12/12/2022 12:06 PM] |
| Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Attorney Mr. Christopher Patrick Desmond for Appellee Ryohei Akima Certificate of Service: 12/02/2022. [22-2058] (CPD) [Entered: 12/02/2022 04:18 PM] |
| Filing 10 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee Ryohei Akima by Christopher P. Desmond. Certificate of Service: 12/02/2022. [22-2058] (CPD) [Entered: 12/02/2022 04:17 PM] |
| Filing 9 ***DOCUMENT LOCKED: Editable document. Document must be filed as non-modifiable pdf. Counsel instructed to print form as pdf and then save so it cannot be edited. Please re-file this saved document.*** CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Attorney Mr. Christopher Patrick Desmond for Appellee Ryohei Akima Certificate of Service: 12/02/2022. [22-2058]--[Edited 12/02/2022 by JAS] (CPD) [Entered: 12/02/2022 03:34 PM] |
| Filing 8 ***DOCUMENT LOCKED: Editable document. Document must be filed as non-modifiable pdf. Counsel instructed to print form as pdf and then save so it cannot be edited. Please re-file this saved document.*** APPEARANCE filed for Appellee Ryohei Akima by Christopher P. Desmond. Certificate of Service: 12/02/2022. [22-2058]--[Edited 12/02/2022 by JAS] (CPD) [Entered: 12/02/2022 03:32 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE filed for Appellant Caitlyn M. Peca by T. Joseph Seward. Certificate of Service: 12/01/2022. [22-2058] (TJS) [Entered: 12/01/2022 10:24 AM] |
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Attorney Ms. Kali May Lester Henderson for Appellant Caitlyn M. Peca Certificate of Service: 12/01/2022. [22-2058] (KMH) [Entered: 12/01/2022 10:23 AM] |
| Filing 5 CIVIL APPEAL STATEMENT OF PARTIES AND ISSUES filed by Attorney Ms. Kali May Lester Henderson for Appellant Caitlyn M. Peca.. Certificate of Service: 12/01/2022. [22-2058] (KMH) [Entered: 12/01/2022 10:23 AM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE filed for Appellant Caitlyn M. Peca by Kali M. L. Henderson. Certificate of Service: 12/01/2022. [22-2058] (KMH) [Entered: 12/01/2022 10:22 AM] |
| Filing 3 MEDIATION OFFICE is involved in this appeal. VIDEO CONFERENCE: A Mediation conference has been scheduled for 01/09/2023 at 2:00 PM (ET) with Catherine Geyer. [Please open notice for important details and deadlines.] (LMR) [Entered: 11/23/2022 02:57 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Robin L. Baker (RLB) [Entered: 11/22/2022 09:41 AM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Caitlyn M. Peca. Transcript needed: y. (RLB) [Entered: 11/22/2022 09:39 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
